MY attention has been arrested by the address delivered
in the Adyar course by Dr. Daly and reported in the September Theosophist.
It is entitled "Clairvoyance."
Coming out in the Adyar course, it has a certain flavor of authority which
will appeal to many members of the Society and may cause them to adopt the
suggestions for practice given in the latter part of the address. Yet at
the same time it is very true that the Theosophical Society is not responsible
for the utterances of members in their private capacity.
The fact that clairvoyance is a power sought after by many persons cannot
be disputed, but the questions, Is it well to try to develop clairvoyance?
and Shall we teach it? have not yet been definitely decided. Hence I may
be permitted to give my views upon them.
At the outset I desire to declare my personal attitude on these questions
and my beliefs as to facts. In using the term "clairvoyance" I
intend to include in it all clear perception on that plane.
I. I have for many years been convinced by proofs furnished by others
and from personal experience that clairvoyance is a power belonging to
man's s inner nature; and also that it is possessed by the animal kingdom.
2. This faculty is either inherited or educed by practice.
3. Those who have it by birth are generally physically diseased or nervously
deranged. The cases where clairvoyance is shown by a perfectly healthy
and well-balanced person are rare.
4. The records of spiritualism for over forty years in America conclusively
prove that clairvoyance cannot be safely sought after by persons who have
no competent guide; that its pursuit has done harm; and that almost every
medium to whom one puts the question "Am I able to develop clairvoyance?"
will reply "Yes."
5. There are no competent guides in this pursuit to be found here or in
Europe who are willing to teach one how to acquire it without danger.
6. The qualifications such a guide should possess render the finding of
one difficult if not impossible. They are: the power to look within and
see clearly the whole inner nature of the student; a complete knowledge
of all the planes upon which clairvoyance acts, including knowledge of
the source, the meaning, and the effect of all that is perceived by the
clairvoyant; and last, but not least, the power to stop at will the exercise
of the power. Evidently these requirements call for an adept.
Who are the teachers of clairvoyance, and those who advise that it be
practiced? In the main, the first are mediums, and any investigator knows
how little they know. Every one of them differs from every other in his
powers. The majority have only one sort of clairvoyance; here and there
are some who combine, at most, three classes of the faculty. Not a single
one is able to mentally see behind the image or idea perceived, and cannot
say in a given case whether the image seen is the object itself or the result
of a thought from another mind. For in these planes of perception the thoughts
of men become as objective as material objects are to our human eyes. It
is true that a clairvoyant can tell you that what is being thus perceived
is not apprehended by the physical eye, but beyond that he cannot go. Of
this I have had hundreds of examples. In 99 out of 100 instances the seer
mistook the thought from another mind for a clairvoyant perception of a
living person or physical object.
The seers of whom I speak see always according to their inner tendency,
which is governed by subtle laws of heredity which are wholly unknown to
scientific men and much more to mediums and seers. One will only reach the
symbolic plane; another that which is known to occultists as the positive
side of sound; another to the negative or positive aspects of the epidermis
and its emanations; and so on through innumerable layer after layer of clairvoyance
and octave after octave of vibrations. They all know but the little they
have experienced, and for any other person to seek to develop the power
is dangerous. The philosophy of it all, the laws that cause the image to
appear and disappear, are terra incognita.
The occult septenary scheme in nature with all its modifications produces
multiple effects, and no mere clairvoyant is able to see the truth that
underlies the simplest instance of clairvoyant perception. If a man moves
from one chair to another, immediately hundreds of possibilities arise for
the clairvoyant eye, and he alone who is a highly trained and philosophical
seer - an adept, in short - can combine them all so as to arrive at true
clear-perception. In the simple act described almost all the centres of
force in the moving being go into operation, and each one produces its own
peculiar effect in the astral light. At once the motion made and thoughts
aroused elicit their own sound, color, motion in ether, amount of etheric
light, symbolic picture, disturbance of elemental forces, and so on through
the great catalogue. Did but one wink his eye, the same effects follow in
due order. And the seer can perceive but that which attunes itself to his
own development and personal peculiarities, all limited in force and degree.
What, may I ask, do clairvoyants know of the law of prevention or encrustation
which is acting always with many people? Nothing, absolutely nothing. How
do they explain those cases where, try as they will, they cannot see anything
whatever regarding certain things? Judging from human nature and the sordidness
of many schools of clairvoyance, are we not safe in affirming that if there
were any real or reliable clairvoyance about us now-a-days among those who
offer to teach it or take pay for it, long ago fortunes would have been
made by them, banks despoiled, lost articles found, and friends more often
reunited? Admitting that there have been sporadic instances of success on
these lines, does not the exception prove that true clairvoyance is not
understood or likely to be?
But what shall theosophists do? Stop all attempts at clairvoyance. And why?
Because it leads them slowly but surely - almost beyond recall into an interior
and exterior passive state where the will is gradually overpowered and they
are at last in the power of the demons who lurk around the threshold of
our consciousness. Above all, follow no advice to "sit for development."
Madness lies that way. The feathery touches which come upon the skin while
trying these experiments are said by mediums to be the gentle touches of
"the spirits." But they are not. They are caused by the ethereal
fluids from within us making their way out through the skin and thus producing
the illusion of a touch. When enough has gone out, then the victim is getting
gradually negative, the future prey for spooks and will-o'-the-wisp images.
"But what," they say, "shall we pursue and study?"
Study the philosophy of life, leave the decorations that line the road of
spiritual development for future lives, and practice altruism.
WILLIAM Q. JUDGE
Path, December, 1890